Not follow guidelines, that is. When a writer fails to follow submission guidelines, they're automatically rejected, usually without reading their story.

I told the students in my two Intro To Literature classes this semester that their final papers must be submitted in hard copy. That was to avoid the problem of being sent attachments in formats I can't read, or of getting garbled attachments, or of being sent the paper in plain text in the body of the e-mail rather than in correct format, or of the inevitable student who claims "I e-mailed you the paper; didn't you get it?" And also, frankly, because I'm not going to read the papers online, so the student is passing off to me the expense of printing out the paper, and that's just flat-out rude (and costly, if all forty-odd students do the same).

So what did I have in my e-mail inbox this morning? You guessed it. Now, the question is whether I should accept them or not. Right now it's only two, so I'm inclined to take them, but I can guarantee I won't be in a good mood when I'm grading them...

Bleh. Read the guidelines!

EDITED TO ADD: Yeah, yeah, yeah. All of you are right -- see, I can learn from peer input. :-) Consider it done.

From: [identity profile] maiac.livejournal.com


We have a consensus. Make them submit hard copy. It will prepare them for the real world.

My Journalism 101 professor deducted a full grade point for every spelling error or typo in the articles we submitted, to teach us that Accuracy Counts.

Yeah, this was 20 years ago. It's obvious that journalistic standards are no longer enforced in journalism, at least not in the U.S.

From: [identity profile] lsanderson.livejournal.com

WoW!


There's journalistic standards here? I never knew!
.

Profile

sleigh: (Default)
sleigh
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags