Not follow guidelines, that is. When a writer fails to follow submission guidelines, they're automatically rejected, usually without reading their story.
I told the students in my two Intro To Literature classes this semester that their final papers must be submitted in hard copy. That was to avoid the problem of being sent attachments in formats I can't read, or of getting garbled attachments, or of being sent the paper in plain text in the body of the e-mail rather than in correct format, or of the inevitable student who claims "I e-mailed you the paper; didn't you get it?" And also, frankly, because I'm not going to read the papers online, so the student is passing off to me the expense of printing out the paper, and that's just flat-out rude (and costly, if all forty-odd students do the same).
So what did I have in my e-mail inbox this morning? You guessed it. Now, the question is whether I should accept them or not. Right now it's only two, so I'm inclined to take them, but I can guarantee I won't be in a good mood when I'm grading them...
Bleh. Read the guidelines!
EDITED TO ADD: Yeah, yeah, yeah. All of you are right -- see, I can learn from peer input. :-) Consider it done.
I told the students in my two Intro To Literature classes this semester that their final papers must be submitted in hard copy. That was to avoid the problem of being sent attachments in formats I can't read, or of getting garbled attachments, or of being sent the paper in plain text in the body of the e-mail rather than in correct format, or of the inevitable student who claims "I e-mailed you the paper; didn't you get it?" And also, frankly, because I'm not going to read the papers online, so the student is passing off to me the expense of printing out the paper, and that's just flat-out rude (and costly, if all forty-odd students do the same).
So what did I have in my e-mail inbox this morning? You guessed it. Now, the question is whether I should accept them or not. Right now it's only two, so I'm inclined to take them, but I can guarantee I won't be in a good mood when I'm grading them...
Bleh. Read the guidelines!
EDITED TO ADD: Yeah, yeah, yeah. All of you are right -- see, I can learn from peer input. :-) Consider it done.
From:
no subject
1. You get rejected out of hand--learning that you are not special and you need to do things the proper way the first time; or
2. You have to go personally and fix the thing you messed up--learning that everyone makes mistakes and if you are willing to go through the trouble of personally attending to it, you may get a reprieve.
Both are valuable lessons. So I would say... don't just accept them!
But I'm mean that way. :D
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Make them snail mail them to you. Priority mail, 3.95, no problem.
From:
no subject
This does, however, make it easier for you to google any passages you think might be stolen.... ;-)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
In the Real World, if you fail to follow directions, it can result in bad things. Better they learn that in this relatively benign situation.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
My Journalism 101 professor deducted a full grade point for every spelling error or typo in the articles we submitted, to teach us that Accuracy Counts.
Yeah, this was 20 years ago. It's obvious that journalistic standards are no longer enforced in journalism, at least not in the U.S.
From:
WoW!
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
-->Aren't you glad to know your blog readers are a bunch of hardasses? ;-)