On one of the writers email group to which I belong a discussion on Tarot cards recently erupted, and I was surprised to find how many writers owned a Tarot set (or several) and that they seemed to regularly get them out.
The Tarot has always interested me as well; I have three decks. You can see them in the picture below. From the top and moving clockwise:
-- one version of the Rider-Waite deck, which is probably the most popular deck in use, and the one you generally see as the ‘generic’ Tarot deck. I was given this one long ago, my first deck, and though I’m not a great fan of the artwork and the rather Christian symbology of the deck, it was my first introduction to the Tarot.
-- the medieval Scapini deck. It’s a lovely-looking deck, which Denise gave me as a present. She has a good eye for the kind of art I like.
-- Aleister Crowley’s Thoth deck, which is the one to which I’ll usually gravitate. I’ve had this one for some time (and I believe that, again, Denise got it for me after I expressed in interest in getting the deck.)
I’m not one who believes that the Tarot has the ability to foretell the future -- in truth, most Tarot devotees might agree with that statement, as most look on the deck being able to show a possible path through the near future, a kind of “if this goes on” situation, but not one that is fixed and unchangeable. The Tarot is generally supposed to act as a guide.
For me, it’s more an occasional meditation exercise: I’ll look at an array and the symbology of the cards, and think about what import they might have for me. It’s far less ‘fortune-telling’ than a way of giving me something on which to focus.
Plus, often they have some lovely art on them -- which is why I prefer the Crowley deck. I’ll might pick up a deck if I like the images, but I’m neither obsessed by the Tarot nor much of a believer in its fortune-telling abilities (nor very practiced at ‘reading’ the cards). But they do pique my interest...


From:
no subject