Final election thoughts:
California, I'm disappointed. I expected the other two gay marriage bans in other states to go through, but I thought you would vote for sanity and compassion and human rights and quash yours. You didn't. It was close, but too many of you were bigoted, for that's what it is: bigotry.
I understand that there is currently a push to dispute this amendment with the Supreme Court, as it denies a minority group the rights granted to a majority group and is thus unconstitutional, just as denying African-Americans the right to marry in this country would be unconstitutional. I hope that happens -- I find that to be an excellent argument.
We shall see. This battle might have been lost but the war is far from over.
******
Came across this on John Scalzi's blog, so many of you may have already seen it. Fox News (!) did a bit on the untold, off-the-record-until-after-the-election things their reporter was told about Sarah Palin by staffers in the McCain campaign. It's... interesting and would indicate that there was little-to-no vetting of her as a candidate beforehand. Click here if you're interested in hearing it.
California, I'm disappointed. I expected the other two gay marriage bans in other states to go through, but I thought you would vote for sanity and compassion and human rights and quash yours. You didn't. It was close, but too many of you were bigoted, for that's what it is: bigotry.
I understand that there is currently a push to dispute this amendment with the Supreme Court, as it denies a minority group the rights granted to a majority group and is thus unconstitutional, just as denying African-Americans the right to marry in this country would be unconstitutional. I hope that happens -- I find that to be an excellent argument.
We shall see. This battle might have been lost but the war is far from over.
******
Came across this on John Scalzi's blog, so many of you may have already seen it. Fox News (!) did a bit on the untold, off-the-record-until-after-the-election things their reporter was told about Sarah Palin by staffers in the McCain campaign. It's... interesting and would indicate that there was little-to-no vetting of her as a candidate beforehand. Click here if you're interested in hearing it.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
But you were right and prescient. It took me longer L-) Ultimately, she alienated the undecided voters and also energized the other side. The far right still loves her, but it's sounding like the moderate faction within the Republican Party really is upset with her. I don't think she's going away, and she may end up causing more divineness among the Republicans. We'll see...
All in all, I think McCain should have gone with his instincts and chosen Lieberman. That would have alienated the base and made them angry, yes, but it would have cemented the "maverick" message and the "work across the aisle" message, would have brought a lot of independents to him, and the base ultimately would have come back because they couldn't pull the lever for Obama. A McCain/Lieberman ticket would have made this a much tighter race.
What do you think?
From: (Anonymous)
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Anyway, getting off the subject there, but, yes, that came out of the blue, and Romney would have been stronger on those issues, but he and McCain had clashing personalities. I know a lot of right wing conservatives would have liked to have Romney on the ticket, though, especially here in Michigan.