I hate this. I hate that I'm suspicious. I hate that if my suspicions are wrong, that someone would do something this heinous to another person. I don't like anything about it.

You've probably read this morning about the McCain volunteer who claims she was robbed, assaulted and branded with a "B" by an African-American man because of the McCain sticker on her car.

I find I'm suspicious that this happened at all. Here's why: the young woman is heavily bruised around her left eye. That's consistent with a right-handed attacker, who is more likely to strike that side of her face. Yet the "B" is on her right cheek, which would be consistent with someone left-handed (think of how you'd have to hold the knife with your right hand to write on someone's right cheek), or by a right-handed person making the mark on their own cheek. Adding to that second suspicion is the fact that the B is backward. Sure, it's possible that the attacker is illiterate enough to have made the B facing the wrong way.... but if you were doing this to yourself by looking in a mirror and didn't remember that the mirror renders letters backward, well, you'd end up with a backward B on your cheek. And it's strangely nice of her assailant that the B was created by shallow scratches that didn't even break the skin, so there won't be permanent defacement.

I'm suspicious. I wonder if this isn't someone trying to cover up another assault with a story that has racial and political overtones. I hate that suspicion. I really do. But I looked at the picture of her and had to wonder.

I hope I'm wrong, and if I am wrong, I hope they catch the bastard and toss him in jail, because anyone who would do such a thing doesn't deserve his freedom, and is ratcheting up the already-tense emotions in this political season.

Argh!

From: [identity profile] jimhines.livejournal.com


If she was knocked down and he was standing/crouching over her, the B works. I.e., it's upside down, not backwards. Except that she specifies he was kneeling on her chest, doesn't she.

Regardless, I agree that the bastard needs to be locked away.

From: [identity profile] sleigh.livejournal.com


Except that she specifies he was kneeling on her chest, doesn't she...

Exactly. He was facing her and writing on her right cheek. Ergo, he writes left-handed.

From: [identity profile] barbarienne.livejournal.com


You should join the CSI team. :-)

I'm sure this will turn out to be a case of her being a total whackjob. Somehow these things always do, like firefighters turning arsonist.

In any event, whoever did this--be it her, or an actual assailant--does indeed need to be locked up in an appropriate facility.
Edited Date: 2008-10-24 02:44 pm (UTC)

From: [identity profile] sleigh.livejournal.com


There's no doubt that someone beat her -- she didn't do all that damage to herself. My thought is that she might be trying to cover up who really did this to her, and has made a bad decision as to how to do that.

And the person who beat her deserves what he (that being the most likely gender, unfortunately) gets.

From: [identity profile] casaubon.livejournal.com


The right/left handed stuff doesn't really help. I throw/catch/punch/fence/swing a bat with my right hand and write with my left.
I assume lots of other people are similarly inclined.

I'll hasten to add that I have an alibi!

And I'll agree with your other comments.

From: [identity profile] sleigh.livejournal.com


Hmm, I rather doubt that "bats right, writes left" is all that common...

But it's certainly possible.

From: [identity profile] chris-goodwin.livejournal.com


My wife writes left, but does most other things right. It's apparently not that uncommon.

From: [identity profile] casaubon.livejournal.com


Well, I meant "lots" in absolute terms rather than as a percentage. :)

From: [identity profile] jdonat.livejournal.com

switch hitting.....


I do! I golf right handed too. Most other things, I'm very left-handed.

The mirror image thing confuses me -lefties usually have no problem with writing correctly when looking in a mirror. Maybe our brains really 'are' wired differently!

From: [identity profile] tesla-aldrich.livejournal.com


I think you might be surprised at how common it is.

Usually when you're learning a new skill, the person teaching you doesn't even bother to find out which is you dominant hand, assuming it's the right. But sometimes they do, and that leads to a weird mishmash of handedness.

I (for example) write, play guitar, use chisels, and throw projectiles left handed; I fire guns, prepare food, and use scissors and saws right-handed. (I don't bat or bowl often, so I'm equally dismal with both hands.)

From: [identity profile] sleigh.livejournal.com


And, admittedly, I have to count myself among the right/left switch-hitters. I write right, but mouse left, I can bat either way. And one of the drawings that got me into the art program in college was a sketch of my hands -- the left hand drawn by the right hand and the right drawn by the left.

From: [identity profile] tcastleb.livejournal.com


Yeah, it's getting nasty; the No on 8 campaign out here is getting blackmailed (http://www.cbs8.com/stories/story.144185.html) by the Yes on 8 people.

From: [identity profile] sleigh.livejournal.com


Oh my. That's really ugly... What's worse is the possibility that such a blackmail campaign would work.
ext_13495: (Default)

From: [identity profile] netmouse.livejournal.com


*sigh* yeah, there's nothing in that photo that convinces me she was attacked at all. It all looks like makeup. The right side of her faces doe not actually look bruised - there's no swelling, no shine, no discoloration to speak of, just a darkening that would be easily applied with makeup. The backwards "B" doesn't even look like a cut. Certainly not a cut applied angrily with a knife.

I don't believe the story in the least. Which is sad, yes, but it's my reaction.

From: [identity profile] sleigh.livejournal.com


Huh. I assumed the black eye was genuine (I guess that comes from not knowing the ability of makup well enough), but you're right in that there's very little puffiness...

From: [identity profile] doclnghair.livejournal.com


Looking closely at the picture I am conviced you hit it exactly. This is a fake. Remember Morton Downey Jr and the "Nazi attack" anyone?

From: [identity profile] sleigh.livejournal.com


I guess we'll let it play out. I notice that now there's a comment in the article that the police have some issues with her story.

From: [identity profile] jdonat.livejournal.com

busted!


from KDKA.. she made it up... looks like she's going to be in some sort of trouble herself... oopie.

http://kdka.com/local/attack.McCain.Bloomfield.2.847628.html

From: [identity profile] jdonat.livejournal.com

Re: busted!


Yeah, I agree. Poor girl.

I'm just happy it got out to all the major media as quick as it did. CNN,et al.


From: [identity profile] sleigh.livejournal.com


I hope we get a chance to find out, one way or the other. If it is a fake, the story could just disappear.

From: [identity profile] lauriemann.livejournal.com


That "happened" here in Pittsburgh on Wednesday night. It was the LEAD STORY on one of the local TV stations last night.

*sigh*

Bloomfield, the neighborhood in which this is alleged to have happened, is a mixed working class neighborhood. She first claimed she was assaulted at 9pm. I drive through that neighborhood all the time; the odds of being assaulted around that time are slim and none.

When I read the story last evening, the "she did not seek medical attention" was what hit me. Huh? No matter how "not hurt" you claim you are, if you were attacked you should always get medical attention to immediately document your injuries, no matter how minor.

When I saw the photo, it looks like she was scratched by a pin or a nail rather than a knife. And wouldn't a mad assaulter be less neat about how he carved up her face???

I think this is completely bogus, and payback for the reporter who was assaulted at a Palin rally. Also, Palin was in our area last night and this morning - wonder if the staffer was trying to get attention from Palin?

While the Obama people immediately apologized, I think the rest of us should be extremely skeptical of this young woman's story. I heard a rumor she's going to be sent to have a lie detector test. Should be interesting...

From: [identity profile] lindajdunn.livejournal.com

You are Correct


http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/6076307.html

She's already changed her story.

I thought the same thing when I read it. There was something in the description that just didn't sound or feel right to me. I attribute it to working in IT and being, for too many years, the person who received every single gosh-darn urban legend e-mail received by anyone in the office. Sigh!

I'm betting she WAS beaten, but invented a story to explain the injuries to her parents. At least, if I was an author... [grin]... that's when I'd start complaining that the story was too predictable.

From: [identity profile] lollardfish.livejournal.com


Newest news. Police source says fake. (http://kdka.com/local/attack.McCain.Bloomfield.2.847628.html)

From: [identity profile] sleigh.livejournal.com


Thought so. *sigh* They didn't even need inconsistencies in her story to be suspicious; all they needed to do was look at the marks on the face.
ext_73228: Headshot of Geri Sullivan, cropped from Ultraman Hugo pix (Default)

From: [identity profile] gerisullivan.livejournal.com


I'm sorry your suspicions were spot on, though not nearly as sorry as I'd be if they'd turned out to be misplaced.

[livejournal.com profile] rivka already wrote pretty much everything I'm thinking on the topic (http://rivka.livejournal.com/465815.html).

I know right where you were coming from when you wrote how you hated that you were suspicious. I had that same reaction to another horrific news story a few months ago. And, yes, my suspicions proved true. But it's little comfort. As Rivka wrote, it's all just sick and sad.

From: [identity profile] sleigh.livejournal.com


Part of me is pleased that I saw an issue with the woman's claim, but part of me is also worried about that, because I don't want to be the person who doubts a woman's claim that she was raped or assaulted -- because that happens far, far too often...

*sigh*
ext_73228: Headshot of Geri Sullivan, cropped from Ultraman Hugo pix (Default)

From: [identity profile] gerisullivan.livejournal.com


I wish that weren't still true, but it is.

Much as I know better than to expect it, I haven't stopped wanting to live in a world where a person's word is their bond. And where those bonds are something other than worthless.

From: [identity profile] celticmom1967.livejournal.com

You were right to be suspicious


http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iidrMKZwVNDDlEtkssY6t1xxhg9QD9411DE01

This does not fare well for McCain.

From: [identity profile] sleigh.livejournal.com

Re: You were right to be suspicious


Well, in fairness, this has nothing to do with McCain, any more than blaming it (had the attacker story been true) on Obama. Obama isn't responsible for the actions of every random black man in the world, nor is McCain responsible for the actions of what would seem to be an unstable person who wanted attention.

In a fair society, this would be a total nothing story, having no consequence for either political side.

I'm just not sure we live there.

From: (Anonymous)

Silver Lining


Out of this entire mess, there is a bit of good news: The police did not automatically assume the story was true (or false). I'm old enough to remember a time when a white woman's story like this, no matter the circumstances, would have resulted in a mass round-up of suspects. That did not happen. Harper Lee is probably feeling good about that.

-P
.