The Democratic Party displayed again the skeletal structure of a jellyfish and has given King George exactly what he asked for: the ability to spy on anyone he wishes without having to worry about ugly things like laws or warrants. The Congressional Democrats, too afraid that they may appear "weak on security," opted to tug their collective forelocks and kowtow to the president rather than stand on principle and force the administration to obtain wiretapping warrants from the rubber-stamp FISA court.
After all, that wastes precious time.
The Dems are showing (again) that they have no ability to act together and that they'd all rather cover their own asses than to produce legislation that might actually restore some of the damage the current regime has done to privacy, security, and law. They would rather take no chances with their re-election than do what they were elected to do.
Sure, they claim that hey, this is just a six-month stopgap and after this expires, they're going to make real, substantive changes. Honest. Yeah, right. I believe that.
My bet? Six months from now, the Repugs will start howling again about how if this law isn't extended then evil tearists will be crawling out from the sewers and none of us will be safe because of what the awful, nasty Liberals have done. The Dems will moan and shuffle their feet, talk to their precious focus groups and consult with their pollsters, put both hands on their posteriors, and acquiesce.
They're really good at acquiescence, evidently. We should rename them the Acquiescent Party, with a jellyfish as their mascot. This was a litmus test for whether the Democrats actually wanted to roll back the ravages of this administration and stand up to the illegailities of the last six years, or whether their rhetoric was merely a ploy to get themselves elected.
Now we know.
To the Democrats who voted to go ahead with this: shame on you. You voted to protect yourself, not your constituents.
After all, that wastes precious time.
The Dems are showing (again) that they have no ability to act together and that they'd all rather cover their own asses than to produce legislation that might actually restore some of the damage the current regime has done to privacy, security, and law. They would rather take no chances with their re-election than do what they were elected to do.
Sure, they claim that hey, this is just a six-month stopgap and after this expires, they're going to make real, substantive changes. Honest. Yeah, right. I believe that.
My bet? Six months from now, the Repugs will start howling again about how if this law isn't extended then evil tearists will be crawling out from the sewers and none of us will be safe because of what the awful, nasty Liberals have done. The Dems will moan and shuffle their feet, talk to their precious focus groups and consult with their pollsters, put both hands on their posteriors, and acquiesce.
They're really good at acquiescence, evidently. We should rename them the Acquiescent Party, with a jellyfish as their mascot. This was a litmus test for whether the Democrats actually wanted to roll back the ravages of this administration and stand up to the illegailities of the last six years, or whether their rhetoric was merely a ploy to get themselves elected.
Now we know.
To the Democrats who voted to go ahead with this: shame on you. You voted to protect yourself, not your constituents.
From:
no subject
Or am I being overly cynical here?
From:
no subject
Maybe what it will take is a president who's a Democrat and a Republican Congress -- since the Repugs evidently do know how to work together, and if they see that a Democratic president wielding executive power like the heavy, blunt instrument Bush has made it, they'll enact legislation to bring it back to more reasonable parameters.
Maybe. Certainly the Dems don't appear to have the will to do that in the face of shrill Repug accusations of being "weak on terror."
From:
no subject
B
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Could we stick them all in that machine from that Heinlein book, the "evolution" machine? With work we might get them up to vertebrates willing to defend their social group.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Now it turns out that it's just the minority party that holds that position, because it's the majority who is going to be able to get the information and then use it against the minority.
Power corrupts. It's pretty indiscriminate as to party lines, apparently.